RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Elections’ Category

The Voters Have Made Their Choices

17 May

Some say that one of the new council members-elect will be challenged for eligibility to accept office. The issue raised is whether the candidate qualifies, based on the one year residency requirement. If a challenge is filed, voters can thank our Town Attorney Martin Brannan. In his Response to Motion to Expedite, in the action brought against the Town and Mike Jewitt by Candidate John Prutch, Brannan has already adjudicated the issue:

“Challenges concerning alleged procedural violations of the election  process must be brought prior to the actual election. Sherman v. City of Tempe, 202Ariz. 339, 342, ¶ 9, 45 P.3d 336, 339 (2002); citing Tilson v. Mofford, 153 Ariz. 468, 470, 737 P.2d 1367, 1369 (1987) (holding that “[p]rocedures leading up to an election cannot be questioned after the people have voted, but … must be challenged before the election is held”)(citing Kerby v. Griffin, 48Ariz. 434, 444-46, 62 P.2d 1131, 1135-36 (1936)).”

 
 

Quartzsite Election Results Are In

15 May

DAVE WINS!

Quartzsite Election results are in. Dave wins. However, his advice to the photographer has been condemned by Donna Hale, La Paz County Elections Director. General election May 15 2012. Can Dave get any closer? Dave is said to be a Constable in another jurisdiction.  This behavior resulted in a written complaint today.

It is estimated that two thirds of Quartzsite voters will mail in their ballot for today’s election. No wonder.

 
 

A High School In Quartzsite?

08 May

A last minute addendum to the agenda for the Quartzsite Town Council meeting to be held today at 9:00 am calls for exploring the establishment of a public high school campus here in town.

[The NOTICE of this late change to the agenda is not available online at the time of this report. The required public notice is another of the Town's many public postings in recent history which is not in accordance with Arizona Open Meeting Laws.]

 
 

What They Are Saying About Quartzsite Election

03 May

The Parker Pioneer has published an EDITORIAL regarding the Quartzsite election debacle. Since the Pioneer wrote this, candidate John Prutch has stepped up and demanded that his lawsuit brought against the Town of Quartzsite and its Town Council, Terry Frausto as Clerk, and Mike Jewitt be heard in the Arizona Court of Appeals. There are serious questions to be answered as to the actions of the Town leadership as they have affected the rights of the voters.

 
 

Town Goes To Court – Election Appeal

26 Apr

Town Council candidate John Prutch, former Town Manager, is determined to have his election contest heard in court. Monday his attorney prepared a Notice of Appeal to continue the effort to have a judge decide the fairness of the Quartzsite Primary Election, just held. The Town claims it had also held a “Special” Election with the Primary, for the seat vacated last year by J. Lizzaraga. Prutch seeks to be placed on the ballot for the General Election to be held May 15. The Town Council has already seated Mike Jewitt in the seat in question. A judge must decide if the Town acted improperly.A hearing date will be announced.
The Town and its Town Council are charged in the suit, as well as Mike Jewitt and Clerk Terry Frausto. Count 1 includes accusations of misrepresentation and fraud by the Town and Clerk Frausto.

 
 

Wednesday’s Town Hall Style Meeting

19 Apr

Town Hall Style Meeting, April 18, 2012

 

 

Video copyright Moore Photo Imaging, S.W. Desert News – Thank you!

 
 

Town Goes To Court – Monday Morning

15 Apr

A court action has been brought to contest the election of council members. Last week’s court hearing in Phoenix resulted in a change in venue. That is, the hearing is reset for 8:30 am Monday April 16 in the Superior Court in Parker at 1316  Kofa Avenue. This is another chance to join your neighbors to observe the proceedings from the public seats. Your tax dollars  are paying for most of the cost of this contest. The action brought by candidate for Town Council John Prutch will likely be decided quickly to preserve the integrity of the election. At issue is having Mr. Prutch placed onthe ballot for the May 15 general election in a timely manner. Grave concerns exist as to the handling of the entire election process by the Town of  Quartzsite leadership.

The suit is brought against: The Town and the Town Council, as well as Terry Frausto, and Mike Jewitt.

 
 

Special Meeting – Election Results

30 Mar

Quartzsite Town Council Special Meeting March 30 2012 at  2pm

Video copyright Moore Photo Imaging, S.W. Desert News – Thank you!

 
 

Video Today’s Council Meeting

27 Mar

Canvass the Primary Election of March 13…

Video copyright Moore Photo Imaging, S.W. Desert News – Thank you!

 
 

Court Computer Quashed

01 Mar
Q
Q

The FBI is investigating Quartzsite leadership regarding
corruption in the entire system.

Now today, the Quartzsite Magistrate Court clerk reports that the computer hard disk drive “burned”. Technicians are trying to restore the data from the hard disk drive. Surprisingly, there is said to be no backup copy of the data.

Meanwhile, the judge is away all this week at a judges’ conference. Since Tuesday, at least one defendant was told he cannot see his own court file until the Judge returns on Tuesday March 6.

 
 

FBI In Town

16 Feb

ParkerLiveOnline.com has obtained the letter from Sam Vederman, La Paz County Attorney, sent to the Federal Bureau of Investigation on January 3, 2012. Vederman requested an investigation of the Town of Quartzsite.

READ THE STORY

READ THE LETTER TO F.B.I.

 
 

Town Hall Style Meeting

16 Feb

February 15 2012:

Video copyright Moore Photo Imaging, S.W. Desert News – Thank you!

 
 

It’s About Your Town, Quartzsite Voters

16 Feb

Please don’t miss this eye-opening story that has caught the attention of the state of Arizona:

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2012/01/23/20120123quartzsite-feud-spills-into-court-internet.html

Editor: Vote! Voters will soon decide if stories like this will continue to appear. Voters will pay for the resulting lawsuits as well. Read the story just below. The Town Manager reports that the budget for legal expenses is already used.

 
 

Renting Out Town’s Heavy Equipment – To Mayor Wannabe Lukkasson!

14 Feb

Video copyright Moore Photo Imaging, S.W. Desert News – Thank you!

Minute marker

 

HIGHLIGHTS February 14 2012 Council Meeting

2:45

 Taft explains a weekend equipment disappearance of taxpayer owned equipment for use on private property.  The backhoe was apparently used to make repairs to the Eatery property. Eatery employee Jerry Lukkasson is a candidate for mayor, but does not currently hold any office. He was invoiced for the equipment use, not the restaurant, per Taft. Taft does not deny that the Town is competing with private enterprise, just charging more for it.

5:55

The Town’s budget for legal expenses is bust. Current Quartzsite Town Manager Taft glosses over the heavy legal expenses incurred for the town mismanagement:“Our legal department budget has currently expensed up to 97 percent of its budget. As a result of legal actions taken and defended by the Town of Quartzsite.  Thus far, no judgements have been set or paid by the Town.  So the expense of legal fees have been proactively effected. “ Taft will surely be asked what she meant by “proactively”.

35:20

I.G.A. Election. [Note that the Town apparently is already well committed to this election. Procedures have already been underway for weeks.  The County has already held training sessions for poll clerks and printed ballots and planned the election, prior to this late agreement.]

36:30

Tourism Zone denied
 
 

This Just In

28 Jan

Robert H Jackson

The prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America. His discretion is tremendous. He can have citizens investigated and, if he is that kind of person, he can have this done to the tune of public statements and veiled or unveiled intimations. Or the prosecutor may choose a more subtle course and simply have a citizen’s friends interviewed. The prosecutor can order arrests, present cases to the grand jury in secret session, and on the basis of his one-sided presentation of the facts, can cause the citizen to be indicted and held for trial. He may dismiss the case before trial, in which case the defense never has a chance to be heard. Or he may go on with a public trial. If he obtains a conviction, the prosecutor can still make recommendations as to sentence, as to whether the prisoner should get probation or a suspended sentence, and after he is put away, as to whether he is a fit subject for parole. While the prosecutor at his best is one of the most beneficent forces in our society, when he acts from  malice or other base motives, he is one of the worst.

U.S. Attorney General Robert H. Jackson, April 1, 1940

 
 
 

HostGator WordPress Hosting